MiG-21 model in 1/32 scale "Upgrading the Revell kits" : various kit reviews & modelling reports "Looking at the Trumpeter kits..." |
Finish AF Mig-21 F13 page 14 DDR Mig-21 MF page 8 Indian AF Mig-21MF page 9 Czech Mig 21 UM page 10 Last update on page 14 |
|
The Mikoyan
Gurevich MiG-21 is one of the most "famous" and widely used Russian /Soviet
fighter planes, with more than 5,000 being produced. Being flown in Vietnam
by the North Vietnamese, and known in NATO as the "Fishbed", it appeared
in many variants, starting with the Mig-21 F-13 in the fifties to the later
Mig-21 MF with quite a different appearance. The F-13 was a real fighter
with only canon armament and a single piece canopy that hinged forward.
Later on, various Mig-21 variants appeared...
LOOK FOR BRIEF MiG-21 HISTORY here at this site... The Chinese Trumpeter manufacturer issued several kits of the Mig-21 , including that of the subtype F-13 . So how do those kits compare and what to do next? Looking at the Trumpeter kit, which represents in kit box no. 2210 a Mig-21 F-13 "early mig", the kit requires quite some studying as there are many delicate parts. Unbelievable how much this Chinese kit company Trumpeter has learned and made progress in a few years! The kit is far better in details and fineness than their first Mig-15 kits series, although these were also quite good.
|
Trumpeter kit Mig-21 F-13 4+ publication drawing |
|
The Mig-21 was and is still available from Revell in 1/32 scale for years, with some different issues of the kit. Starting in the seventies, the older style Mig-21 type F13 was issued by Revell with later kits having extra parts to make a Mig-21 MF such a dorsal spine, larger tail and extra improved cockpit parts and stores. This report will look at both Revell and Trumpeter kits.
|
Revell kit Mig-21 M/MF box |
|
The beginning with any
kit as always is to study the best references. With the political opening
of the Eastern block and the Chinese economic wonder, Trumpeter got access
to information required and came with a very good kit. Looking at pictures,
this kit is a real miracle. The details are very good and the kit pays
attention to detail. When measuring up the kit with reference data from
various sources, it seems to be very accurate. Probably Trumpeter
had access to a real Mig-21 in China to do measurements, so this is no
real surprise.
You get besides the obvious parts
in the Trumpeter Mig-21 / F-13 kit [referred to here
as kit no.1]:
The kit has very good surface detail,
with nicely engraved lines, rivets, added raising plate details etc. Very
good indeed!
note below the
F13 decals and the photo negative type of instruments
|
|
|
But
what about the Revell kit in 1/32?
The Revell kit as Mig-21 M/MF, kit no 04771 seems to give opportunities to improve it using the Trumpeter kit as an additional source of information. Compared to the first Revell Mig-21
kits issued (in the nineteen seventies), it has in its re-issued
form some extra parts to make a better kit with an improved seat, new canopy
with separate windshield and also has a larger spine (for the MF) on top
of the fuselage.
When you compare the Revell kit with the Trumpeter kit, you can use the Trumpeter kit with some additional references and pictures to "upgrade the Revell kit". It is quite strange and surprising indeed that Revell managed to mould this kit so well in dimensional sense considering its very old age back in the cold war. The Revell kit is basic and has its faults, but all can be corrected. Lets start
with the most large ones, to correct them first before going into detailing.
What about the main parts in the Revell kit? [referred here to as kit no. 2,3, and 4] (1) The basic kits fuselage height is OK, but the width should be 3 mm wider. This can be done quite easily by adding between the fuselage halves some plastic sheet inserts. At the same time you will then get a more correct oval cross section shape, and the Trumpeter kit and Revell kits cross-sections will be remarkably the same. A very nice co-incidence is that the Revell intake ring is too large for a Mig-21 F-13 Early mig, but is quite good for the later MF with the more powerful engine! For the Early Mig-21 F-13 the intake diameter should be 19 mm at the leading edge, and 27 mm for the Mig-21 MF. So the Revell intake is only 1 mm to small in width at the intake but this can be left as is or corrected by adding some small pieces of strip and tapering it into the large width required at the cockpit and along the larger part of the fuselage. Widening the Revell fuselage vastly improves its appearance. But the MF kit of Revell has the fairing added in the kit and this will help on the top of the fuselage. The lower area at the fuselage edges also needs the 3 mm cart inserts. (2) The Revell exhaust pipe is 2 mm too small in diameter, and this can be seen. As you can make the rear fuselage cone wider, some corrections can be done here also. Replacing the exhaust pipe with something "round" from the spare box will help here. (3) The Revell wings are also quite good in plan view and outline. A large fault is the flap outline; the inboard flap should be 3 mm larger in span and you will need thus to "move" the flap tracks fairing 3 mm more outboard. Also, you can slightly correct the lower flap panels. But again, all can be corrected and the Revell kit's wing is quite a good starting point. The position of the Revell wings is OK, but the wing main undercarriage opening should have a larger angle. This also shows that the main undercarriage bay in the fuselage should be moved 5 mm more forward. The lower wing undercarriage bays were then improved by removing some plastic in front and adding a strip aft. Also re-scribe the panels lines. A cut out of the main bays "around the bulges" was made and repositioning it; sounds difficult but can be done. (4) The Mig-21 MF kit has the correct larger wheels provided and the Revell kit has the correct larger bulges on the fuselage. Also, I removed the ceiling of the fuselage main undercarriage bays and made them about 4 mm deeper as in the Trumpeter kit. Detailing will be done later. (5) The lateral position of the cockpit, the nose undercarriage, the wing in height, the taper ratio's, stagger height and separation between the tail and fairings seem all OK. Surprising for such an old kit with very limited information being available at the time. (6) The Revell kit's nose undercarriage bay has some edges moulded on; these were removed and the fuselage intake ring edges slightly aft of the leading edge intake are also removed. Smoothing the inner areas here is needed. (7) The horizontal tail stabilizers of the Revell kit are oversize, but can be corrected at their tips. The tip weight anti flutter balances should be much fatter and larger. (-) More issues to be seen later on and to be yet discovered.. So, continue
to upgrade the Revell kit with the Trumpeter kit as pattern example? Very
well indeed and very worth the effort.
|
Trumpeter kit (top) and Revell kit fuselage comparison, but the main uc bay is at the wrong position when you look at the lengths and positions of the wings. Trumpeter kit (left) and Revell kit cross section at the tail, the Trumpeter kit being more accurate.
|
|
Next steps?.....
Go to next
Mig-21 [page 2 ]
|
||
Back to 32 scale Models....... |
Look here for a Video on the Mig-21 at YouTube |
|
(c) Copyright "designer"/ All rights reserved/ Amsterdam The Netherlands.Your comments are welcomed by webmaster |
Created this page February 10, 2002 |